Showing posts with label Penelope Lively. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Penelope Lively. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 January 2017

The giver and the receiver

Four stories by Karen Blixen/Isak Dinesen

Re-reading after some years: Shadows on the Grass, published in the '60s (Penguin).  The portrait on the cover is an oil painting by Blixen, of a Somali child, one of her servants in Kenya. Realising he was a mathematical genius, she 'scraped the money together' to send him to school. When he asked for a typewriter, she bought it for him. Many years later, he wrote to thank her, explaining that the typewriter gave him a significant advantage when he applied for jobs. He became a judge.

Blixen wrote in English, a foreign language. Do writers whose mother tongue is not English experience more freedom to write in unusual ways? (I'm thinking for instance of the Pakistani/British writer Nadeem Aslam.)

The two sentences I most loved:

The first for the way the structure represents Berkeley Cole's leisurely, round-about journey:

"On a day in the beginning of the long rains Berkeley Cole came round the farm from up-country, on his way to Nairobi." (p. 69, The Great Gesture). 


Also, for being thought-provoking:
"A gift may be named after both the giver and the receiver, and in this way my inspiration is my own, more even than anything else I possess, and is still the gift of God." (p. 96, Echoes from the Hills).

All along this book, I heard in my mind the deep longing in Meryl Streep's voice in the film about Blixen in Kenya Out of Africa: "I had a farm in Africa..."

I've just read Penelope Lively's How it all started, about the unexpected ways in which a person's action can affect others. I found it clumsy and uncharming in comparison. 

* * *

I've just edited this post. Today is 2 June 2025. Since the original post, I completed a second writing course (1 year) and published a book. The publisher made me rewrite the book twice. I learnt a lot.

Tuesday, 25 August 2009

Full tilt

Very very late with the newsletter. It is due for publication this time next week: in the urgency to get other things done I forgot about it. No, I didn't forget, I mistakenly thought I had plenty of time. I should be panicking.

I made time - what does that expression mean? Stretch time to suit the needs of the moment...it's as easy as trying to squeeze more water into a bottle. I'll have to work full tilt for the rest of the week.

Having made time as described above, I read Penelope Lively's Spiderweb, (1998, Penguin) short and sharp. A nice psychological consistency to the solution the main character finds to her dilemma at the end of the book. Good pacing in terms of the anxiety we experience on her behalf. I also enjoyed the lack of a 'proper' ending, less predictable. A good novel: the characters interact in credible ways, affect each other, and move accordingly. Very tidy. Not a great novel, but a good one. That sounds snooty: I mean, if I could write like that I'd be very happy.

Having finished a major project - that finishing has played havoc with my sense of urgency for other things to be done - I watched two movies that I'd missed at the Film Festival in the last few days, one of them twice. Both describe death, silence and stillness, and the preparation of the body for burial or cremation. P picked up Silent Light by Carlos Reygadas (Mexico) at Aro Street Video. The other I saw at the Penthouse with a friend: the Japanese Oscar-winner (2008, for foreign film) Departures by Yojiro Takita.

Departures is fascinating to watch, for the depiction of ritual and its Zen-like quality. Its weaknesses are sentimentality and the predictability of the story. The Mexican film is harder to watch, more demanding, with slow shots, a slow rhythm to the story and a mysterious development.

Visually, it is wonderful. This is the one I saw twice - a rewarding exercise. The actors are amateurs playing people like themselves, members of Mexico's Mennonite community. They speak a weird kind of German and live religiously. Contact with Spanish-speakers only happens at a time of crisis. I loved the silence and quietness of the characters, which seemed to be a part of the way they live. People spoke briefly, succinctly, with gaps for thought. I'll probably watch it again.